In Episode 227 of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with Saagar Enjeti and Marshall Kosloff, the co-hosts of “The Realignment,” an absolutely phenomenal podcast that consistently produces some of the best conversations at the intersection of politics and society that you will find anywhere.
They are both successful entrepreneurs and thought leaders in their own rights—Saagar Enjeti interviewed former president Donald Trump four separate times in his capacity as Chief Whitehouse Correspondent for the Daily Caller and currently co-hosts the immensely popular “Breaking Points” with Krystal Ball. Marshall Kosloff is an executive producer at “On Deck” where he also hosts “The Deep End,” a podcast where he interviews visionary builders, creators, and experts with world-changing ideas related to the futures of commerce, higher education, governance, longevity, art, and more.
Demetri asked them both to come onto the podcast in order to help him better understand the forces driving dysfunction in American politics, along with phenomenon of rising public mistrust of institutions, and a deeping sense of paranoia in the body politic.
Saagar, Marshall, and Demetri spend the first hour of their conversation discussing how we got here, why the so-called “political experts” whose job it is to explain what’s happening have consistently failed to do so, what the new political consensus is that’s forming in American life, and what it is that the majority of Americans want—what in other words, would constitute a popular platform on which to not only run a successful campaign but from which to govern successfully or are these two things fundamentally incompatible in today’s celebrity-driven, fake it till you make it culture that seems to reward the aesthetics over power in place of power itself?
The second hour of their conversation is spent discussing what Kofinas suggests may be a multi-decade breakdown in belief systems driven by a series of recurring failures, covered up by lies, succeeded by more failures like the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, the 2008 financial crisis and its culture of never-ending bailouts, and most recently the Covid-19 pandemic and the confusing directives and open disregard by health authorities of legitimate public concerns around the vaccines, the risks associated with taking them, mandating who should take them, etc. This also opens the door to a conversation about the changing media landscape and the growing power of independent voices like Joe Rogan’s to influence public opinion and force issues into the public square that would otherwise be deemed off-limits by those in positions of public authority.
You can access the second part of this episode, as well as the transcript and rundown to this week’s conversation through the Hidden Forces Supercast Page. All subscribers gain access to our premium feed, which can be easily added to your favorite podcast application. For those interested in gaining early access to the new Hidden Foces subscription platform on Supercast, please email info@hiddenforces.io for a discount link.
If you enjoyed listening to today’s episode of Hidden Forces you can help support the show by doing the following:
Saagar Enjeti is cohost of Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar and cohost of The Realignment podcast. Previously, he costed Hill TV’s Rising program and served as The Daily Caller’s Chief White House Correspondent. Saagar has interviewed President Donald Trump 4 separate times along with presidential contenders, heads of state, members of congress, Senators, and prominent figures throughout the United States. He earned a masters in U.S. National Security Policy from the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and a bachelor’s in economics and Political Science from George Washington University. He lives in Washington, D.C.
Marshall Kosloff is the cohost of The Realignment podcast, produced in partnership with Lincoln Network and the Hewlett Foundation’s Economy and Society Initiative. He also is an Executive Producer at On Deck, where he hosts The Deep End, a podcast focused on startups and technology. He holds a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Oregon. Marshall lives in New York City.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid enim necesse est, tamquam meretricem in matronarum coetum, sic voluptatem in virtutum concilium adducere? Verum hoc idem saepe faciamus. An potest, inquit ille, quicquam esse suavius quam nihil dolere? Cum autem venissemus in Academiae non sine causa nobilitata spatia, solitudo erat ea, quam volueramus. Neque enim disputari sine reprehensione nec cum iracundia aut pertinacia recte disputari potest. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Quam ob rem tandem, inquit, non satisfacit? Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; Dat enim intervalla et relaxat. Idemque diviserunt naturam hominis in animum et corpus. Nullis enim partitionibus, nullis definitionibus utuntur ipsique dicunt ea se modo probare, quibus natura tacita adsentiatur. Ita ne hoc quidem modo paria peccata sunt. An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Videamus animi partes, quarum est conspectus illustrior;
His singulis copiose responderi solet, sed quae perspicua sunt longa esse non debent. Sic consequentibus vestris sublatis prima tolluntur. Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Quia dolori non voluptas contraria est, sed doloris privatio. Atqui eorum nihil est eius generis, ut sit in fine atque extrerno bonorum. Est enim tanti philosophi tamque nobilis audacter sua decreta defendere.
Illis videtur, qui illud non dubitant bonum dicere -; Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim. Paulum, cum regem Persem captum adduceret, eodem flumine invectio? Illa videamus, quae a te de amicitia dicta sunt. Quis animo aequo videt eum, quem inpure ac flagitiose putet vivere?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quodsi vultum tibi, si incessum fingeres, quo gravior viderere, non esses tui similis; Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt. Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus. Invidiosum nomen est, infame, suspectum. Ut id aliis narrare gestiant? Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. Quod si ita sit, cur opera philosophiae sit danda nescio. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Idcirco enim non desideraret, quia, quod dolore caret, id in voluptate est. An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem.
Portenta haec esse dicit, neque ea ratione ullo modo posse vivi; Quid de Platone aut de Democrito loquar? Quid de Platone aut de Democrito loquar? Sin tantum modo ad indicia veteris memoriae cognoscenda, curiosorum. Cum ageremus, inquit, vitae beatum et eundem supremum diem, scribebamus haec. Quamvis enim depravatae non sint, pravae tamen esse possunt. At miser, si in flagitiosa et vitiosa vita afflueret voluptatibus. Sed tu istuc dixti bene Latine, parum plane.
Aut unde est hoc contritum vetustate proverbium: quicum in tenebris? Conferam tecum, quam cuique verso rem subicias; At enim sequor utilitatem. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Quo plebiscito decreta a senatu est consuli quaestio Cn. Eam tum adesse, cum dolor omnis absit; Illud mihi a te nimium festinanter dictum videtur, sapientis omnis esse semper beatos; Quae qui non vident, nihil umquam magnum ac cognitione dignum amaverunt. Sed quia studebat laudi et dignitati, multum in virtute processerat. Ad eas enim res ab Epicuro praecepta dantur.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid igitur dubitamus in tota eius natura quaerere quid sit effectum? Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Quicquid porro animo cernimus, id omne oritur a sensibus; Causa autem fuit huc veniendi ut quosdam hinc libros promerem. Vide igitur ne non debeas verbis nostris uti, sententiis tuis. Nam, ut sint illa vendibiliora, haec uberiora certe sunt. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quis Pullum Numitorium Fregellanum, proditorem, quamquam rei publicae nostrae profuit, non odit? Nam Metrodorum non puto ipsum professum, sed, cum appellaretur ab Epicuro, repudiare tantum beneficium noluisse; A quibus propter discendi cupiditatem videmus ultimas terras esse peragratas. Eorum enim est haec querela, qui sibi cari sunt seseque diligunt.
Hoc tu nunc in illo probas. Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus?
Quod non faceret, si in voluptate summum bonum poneret. Unum nescio, quo modo possit, si luxuriosus sit, finitas cupiditates habere. Ubi ut eam caperet aut quando? At eum nihili facit; Aliud igitur esse censet gaudere, aliud non dolere. Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas?
Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Quamquam id quidem licebit iis existimare, qui legerint. Hoc non est positum in nostra actione.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Quam si explicavisset, non tam haesitaret. Si id dicis, vicimus. Earum etiam rerum, quas terra gignit, educatio quaedam et perfectio est non dissimilis animantium. Verum tamen cum de rebus grandioribus dicas, ipsae res verba rapiunt; Hoc dixerit potius Ennius: Nimium boni est, cui nihil est mali.
Sed quod proximum fuit non vidit. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba. An me, inquam, nisi te audire vellem, censes haec dicturum fuisse? Tanti autem aderant vesicae et torminum morbi, ut nihil ad eorum magnitudinem posset accedere.
Quantum Aristoxeni ingenium consumptum videmus in musicis? Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Tertium autem omnibus aut maximis rebus iis, quae secundum naturam sint, fruentem vivere. Nam si beatus umquam fuisset, beatam vitam usque ad illum a Cyro extructum rogum pertulisset. Sed quanta sit alias, nunc tantum possitne esse tanta. Ex quo intellegitur officium medium quiddam esse, quod neque in bonis ponatur neque in contrariis. Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. Sed finge non solum callidum eum, qui aliquid improbe faciat, verum etiam praepotentem, ut M. Hoc non est positum in nostra actione. Quod non faceret, si in voluptate summum bonum poneret.
