In Episode 137 of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with professor of finance at Beijing’s Peking University, Michael Pettis. Profesor Pettis’ research has focused mainly on Chinese financial markets, global trade & capital flows, and central banking. He spent seventeen years on Wall Street running fixed-income trading and capital market desks and has advised governments on privatizations of national banking systems and commercial bank debt restructuring & loan issuance.
In their latest book, “Trade Wars are Class Wars,” Michael Pettis and his co-author Matthew Klein argue that rising inequality within countries heightens trade conflicts between them. The entire conversation lasts for approximately two hours and we devote the first hour to understanding how balance of payments and capital flows—themselves heavily dependent on the dynamics of wealth and income distribution within a country’s borders—can generate imbalances in trade, asset prices, interest rates, debt levels, and currency valuations, often leading to misallocations of capital for the surplus and deficit countries alike.
The second hour is devoted to applying this balance of payments framework to specific economies—namely, the United States, the Eurozone, and China. Demetri and Michael discuss how the financial instability generated from the sorts of imbalances discussed in this episode are now seeping into our systems of government, turning a financial crisis into a political one.
For Super Nerds and Autodidacts, you will want to consult your rundowns and have your transcripts handy for this episode. There are links in the rundown to many of the concepts and theories discussed, as well as charts and images that are relevant to the discussion.
You can access the overtime of Demetri’s conversation with Michael Pettis, as well as obtain copies of the transcript and rundown to this week’s episode through the Hidden Forces Supercast Page. All subscribers gain access to our overtime feed, which can be easily added to your favorite podcast application.
Michael Pettis is a professor of finance at Peking University, where he has been teaching since 2004, and Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Before Peking University he taught two years at Tsinghua University, and before that nine years at the Business School and the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. In China his research has focused mainly on Chinese financial markets, global trade and capital flows, and central banking. During his time in China he also spent three years as Chief Strategist for the Hong Kong subsidiary of mainland Chinese brokerage, Shenyin Wanguo.
Pettis spent seventeen years before that on Wall Street running fixed-income trading and capital markets desks. During this time he has advised the Mexican government on the privatization of the national banking system, the Macedonian government on its commercial bank debt restructuring, the South Korean government on its 1998 commercial bank debt restructuring, and various Latin American governments on their debt issuance strategies.
Pettis publishes a blog, China Financial Markets, which was ranked by the Wall Street Journal as one of the top fifteen economic blogs worldwide, and is one of the reasons cited by Bloomberg-BusinessWeek for including him in its 2016 listing of The 50 Most Influential People in the World.Pettis has published widely, including for Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, World Policy Journal, Far Eastern Economic Review, Columbia Journal of World Business, Harvard Business Review, Wilson Quarterly, Financial Times, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, Caijing, and several other leading periodicals.
In May 2020, Yale University Press will publish his book, Trade Wars are Class Wars. His most recent book, Avoiding the Fall: China’s Economic Restructuring, (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2013), was selected by the Financial Times as one of the top ten books on business and economics in 2013. That same year he published The Great Rebalancing: Trade, Conflict and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy (Princeton University Press, 2013), which in 2018 was selected among Barron’s “The 7 Best Books about the Financial Crisis”.
His previous books include After the Fall: The Future of Global Cooperation, (Geneva: ICMBS, 2012, co-authored with Jeffrey Frieden, Dani Rodrik and Ernesto Zedillo), Is China Vulnerable? The Causes and Consequences of Financial Fragility (Tsinghua University Press, 2003), The Volatility Machine: Emerging Economies and the Threat of Financial Collapse (Oxford University Press, 2001), and Managing Sub-Investment Grade Sovereign Risk (Euromoney Press, 1997). He received an MBA in Finance and an MIA in Development Economics from Columbia University.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid, quod res alia tota est? Quia voluptatem hanc esse sentiunt omnes, quam sensus accipiens movetur et iucunditate quadam perfunditur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; Servari enim iustitia nisi a forti viro, nisi a sapiente non potest. Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant. Nec tamen ullo modo summum pecudis bonum et hominis idem mihi videri potest.
Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Sin kakan malitiam dixisses, ad aliud nos unum certum vitium consuetudo Latina traduceret. Atque haec ita iustitiae propria sunt, ut sint virtutum reliquarum communia. Verba tu fingas et ea dicas, quae non sentias?
Refert tamen, quo modo. Hic ambiguo ludimur. A quibus propter discendi cupiditatem videmus ultimas terras esse peragratas. Vos autem cum perspicuis dubia debeatis illustrare, dubiis perspicua conamini tollere.
Ostendit pedes et pectus. Stulti autem malorum memoria torquentur, sapientes bona praeterita grata recordatione renovata delectant. Quid, si reviviscant Platonis illi et deinceps qui eorum auditores fuerunt, et tecum ita loquantur?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Illa sunt similia: hebes acies est cuipiam oculorum, corpore alius senescit; Nec mihi illud dixeris: Haec enim ipsa mihi sunt voluptati, et erant illa Torquatis. Negabat igitur ullam esse artem, quae ipsa a se proficisceretur; Illud non continuo, ut aeque incontentae. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc sic expositum dissimile est superiori. Cur iustitia laudatur? Quorum altera prosunt, nocent altera. Unum nescio, quo modo possit, si luxuriosus sit, finitas cupiditates habere.
Quae similitudo in genere etiam humano apparet. Sapiens autem semper beatus est et est aliquando in dolore; Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Cum ageremus, inquit, vitae beatum et eundem supremum diem, scribebamus haec. Sed erat aequius Triarium aliquid de dissensione nostra iudicare. Idem etiam dolorem saepe perpetiuntur, ne, si id non faciant, incidant in maiorem. Eademne, quae restincta siti? Cum autem venissemus in Academiae non sine causa nobilitata spatia, solitudo erat ea, quam volueramus. Est autem etiam actio quaedam corporis, quae motus et status naturae congruentis tenet; Mihi quidem Antiochum, quem audis, satis belle videris attendere. Pisone in eo gymnasio, quod Ptolomaeum vocatur, unaque nobiscum Q.
Sunt enim prima elementa naturae, quibus auctis vírtutis quasi germen efficitur. Hic nihil fuit, quod quaereremus. Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Nec vero alia sunt quaerenda contra Carneadeam illam sententiam. Cur post Tarentum ad Archytam? Quia dolori non voluptas contraria est, sed doloris privatio. Nihil enim iam habes, quod ad corpus referas; Iam illud quale tandem est, bona praeterita non effluere sapienti, mala meminisse non oportere?
Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum. In quo etsi est magnus, tamen nova pleraque et perpauca de moribus.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Consequens enim est et post oritur, ut dixi. Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. Num igitur eum postea censes anxio animo aut sollicito fuisse? Ad eas enim res ab Epicuro praecepta dantur. Animum autem reliquis rebus ita perfecit, ut corpus; Te ipsum, dignissimum maioribus tuis, voluptasne induxit, ut adolescentulus eriperes P.
Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Vos autem cum perspicuis dubia debeatis illustrare, dubiis perspicua conamini tollere. Profectus in exilium Tubulus statim nec respondere ausus; Illud non continuo, ut aeque incontentae. Cui Tubuli nomen odio non est? Pisone in eo gymnasio, quod Ptolomaeum vocatur, unaque nobiscum Q.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Summus dolor plures dies manere non potest? Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Sed ut iis bonis erigimur, quae expectamus, sic laetamur iis, quae recordamur. Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum. An ea, quae per vinitorem antea consequebatur, per se ipsa curabit? Quem ad modum quis ambulet, sedeat, qui ductus oris, qui vultus in quoque sit? Tria genera bonorum;
Quid censes in Latino fore? Maximas vero virtutes iacere omnis necesse est voluptate dominante. Quid iudicant sensus? Solum praeterea formosum, solum liberum, solum civem, stultost;
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sit enim idem caecus, debilis. Sin te auctoritas commovebat, nobisne omnibus et Platoni ipsi nescio quem illum anteponebas? Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Quod autem principium officii quaerunt, melius quam Pyrrho; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Virtutibus igitur rectissime mihi videris et ad consuetudinem nostrae orationis vitia posuisse contraria.
Quamvis enim depravatae non sint, pravae tamen esse possunt. Semper enim ita adsumit aliquid, ut ea, quae prima dederit, non deserat. Quia dolori non voluptas contraria est, sed doloris privatio. Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem; Huius ego nunc auctoritatem sequens idem faciam. Quis tibi ergo istud dabit praeter Pyrrhonem, Aristonem eorumve similes, quos tu non probas?
Eam stabilem appellas. Praeclarae mortes sunt imperatoriae; Dic in quovis conventu te omnia facere, ne doleas. Verba tu fingas et ea dicas, quae non sentias? Venit enim mihi Platonis in mentem, quem accepimus primum hic disputare solitum; Et ille ridens: Age, age, inquit,-satis enim scite me nostri sermonis principium esse voluisti-exponamus adolescenti,. At certe gravius. Et hunc idem dico, inquieta sed ad virtutes et ad vitia nihil interesse. Apud ceteros autem philosophos, qui quaesivit aliquid, tacet;
Semper enim ita adsumit aliquid, ut ea, quae prima dederit, non deserat. Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. Nihil opus est exemplis hoc facere longius. Sit ista in Graecorum levitate perversitas, qui maledictis insectantur eos, a quibus de veritate dissentiunt. Explanetur igitur. Sed erat aequius Triarium aliquid de dissensione nostra iudicare. Quis est enim, in quo sit cupiditas, quin recte cupidus dici possit? Naturales divitias dixit parabiles esse, quod parvo esset natura contenta. Illud dico, ea, quae dicat, praeclare inter se cohaerere.
