Episode 98
David Webb | Hong Kong Revolution: Geopolitical & Financial Implications for China and the World
Episode 98
David Webb
David Webb | Hong Kong Revolution: Geopolitical & Financial Implications for China and the World
summary
In this week’s episode of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with famed Hong Kong investor David Webb, an outspoken critic of China’s authoritarian grip over the coastal territory.
There are two parts to this story that we explore during this conversation. The first deals with Hong Kong – specifically, its political and economic future as an independent territory of mainland China. The second deals with China itself – specifically, its political and financial stability as the most leveraged economy at scale, in the world.
The events in Hong Kong over the last several months – exacerbated by Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s determination to push through the Extradition bill despite mounting opposition – have created a terrifying sense of crisis and disorder in the city. Videos of police beatings and retaliatory violence by protestors, as well as satellite images of what appear to be armored personnel carriers and other vehicles belonging to China’s paramilitary People’s Armed Police, have created an ominous sense of foreboding in the city. “One country, two systems,” might be the fault line upon which the tectonic forces shaping China’s political and economic development are colliding, creating mountains of civil unrest among Hong Kongers. At what point do the political tremors in Hong Kong become civic earthquakes capable of shattering the fragile peace between these two irreconcilable systems? Will open society prevail in Hong Kong, or will China do whatever it takes in order to reassert control over the former British colony?
In the second part of this conversation, David Webb shares his insights from his decades of experience studying the Chinese economy and investing in Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong. Those insights include a discussion about China’s overleveraged banking system, an overvalued RMB, and a system of Ponzi financing for Chinese companies listed on non-mainland exchanges. David Webb also contests a thesis famously put forward by hedge fund manager Kyle Bass about the precarious position of Hong Kong’s currency and the risk of decoupling with the US dollar. Additional topics include a new “tech cold war,” China’s propaganda battle, the US-China trade war, and much, much more.
There is no overtime to this week’s episode on account of some technical constraints. Instead, we have made the transcript to this conversation available to Overtime subscribers, which will be published in the next day or two. You can gain access to the transcript, as well as a copy of the rundown to this week’s episode directly through our Patreon page.
Producer & Host: Demetri Kofinas
Editor & Engineer: Stylianos Nicolaou
Subscribe & Support the Podcast at https://hiddenforces.supercast.com
Join the conversation on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @hiddenforcespod
bio
David Webb is a Hong Kong resident since 1991 and former investment banker who retired in 1998 to focus on his investments and establish Webb-site.com, a non-profit platform for better corporate and economic governance, which now has over 27,000 subscribers to its free newsletter. The site includes Webb-site Reports, with news, analysis, and opinions on HK affairs, and Webb-site Who’s Who, a database on HK organizations and people, including Webb-site Total Returns on all HK-listed stocks since 1994 and all directors and advisers of HK-listed companies since 1990, all free. David’s been a member of HK’s Takeovers and Mergers Panel since 2001 (a Deputy Chairman since 2013) and was an elected independent director of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd from 2003 to 2008. In the 1980s he was a best-selling author of games and books for the first generation of home computers. He is an Oxford maths graduate, a member of the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders (2005-2011), and former Chairman of Hong Kong Mensa. As a private investor in HK-listed small-caps for over 24 years, filtering for both valuation and governance quality to avoid the lemons more often than average, he has substantially out-performed the market and amassed shareholdings currently over the 5% disclosure threshold in 19 companies or “Webb-chips” as detailed on the site.
@webbhk
transcript
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quam multa vitiosa! summum enim bonum et malum vagiens puer utra voluptate diiudicabit, stante an movente? Ergo ita: non posse honeste vivi, nisi honeste vivatur? Sin kakan malitiam dixisses, ad aliud nos unum certum vitium consuetudo Latina traduceret. Eaedem res maneant alio modo. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Id mihi magnum videtur.
Si enim ita est, vide ne facinus facias, cum mori suadeas. Fortitudinis quaedam praecepta sunt ac paene leges, quae effeminari virum vetant in dolore. Scaevola tribunus plebis ferret ad plebem vellentne de ea re quaeri. Praeclarae mortes sunt imperatoriae; Quae tamen a te agetur non melior, quam illae sunt, quas interdum optines.
Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Quid ad utilitatem tantae pecuniae? Ad eos igitur converte te, quaeso. Etsi qui potest intellegi aut cogitari esse aliquod animal, quod se oderit? Animi enim quoque dolores percipiet omnibus partibus maiores quam corporis. Rationis enim perfectio est virtus; Reguli reiciendam; Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata.
Isto modo ne improbos quidem, si essent boni viri. Quis istud possit, inquit, negare? Nulla erit controversia. At tu eadem ista dic in iudicio aut, si coronam times, dic in senatu. Graccho, eius fere, aequalí? Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina.
Full Episode
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vadem te ad mortem tyranno dabis pro amico, ut Pythagoreus ille Siculo fecit tyranno? Praeclare hoc quidem. Qui autem esse poteris, nisi te amor ipse ceperit? Ratio enim nostra consentit, pugnat oratio. Quam tu ponis in verbis, ego positam in re putabam. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius. Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Eam tum adesse, cum dolor omnis absit; Quod idem cum vestri faciant, non satis magnam tribuunt inventoribus gratiam.
Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Hic Speusippus, hic Xenocrates, hic eius auditor Polemo, cuius illa ipsa sessio fuit, quam videmus. Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Idne consensisse de Calatino plurimas gentis arbitramur, primarium populi fuisse, quod praestantissimus fuisset in conficiendis voluptatibus? Virtutis, magnitudinis animi, patientiae, fortitudinis fomentis dolor mitigari solet. Hosne igitur laudas et hanc eorum, inquam, sententiam sequi nos censes oportere?
Atque ab his initiis profecti omnium virtutum et originem et progressionem persecuti sunt. Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. Pollicetur certe. Ergo, inquit, tibi Q. Praetereo multos, in bis doctum hominem et suavem, Hieronymum, quem iam cur Peripateticum appellem nescio.
Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. Itaque haec cum illis est dissensio, cum Peripateticis nulla sane. Illud dico, ea, quae dicat, praeclare inter se cohaerere. Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest. At enim, qua in vita est aliquid mali, ea beata esse non potest. Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Ergo omni animali illud, quod appetiti positum est in eo, quod naturae est accommodatum. Tu autem, si tibi illa probabantur, cur non propriis verbis ea tenebas? Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas; Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt.
intelligence report
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Quis contra in illa aetate pudorem, constantiam, etiamsi sua nihil intersit, non tamen diligat? An tu me de L. Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Ad quorum et cognitionem et usum iam corroborati natura ipsa praeeunte deducimur.
Ad quorum et cognitionem et usum iam corroborati natura ipsa praeeunte deducimur. Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Quod autem ratione actum est, id officium appellamus. Quis istud, quaeso, nesciebat? Eadem nunc mea adversum te oratio est. Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus.
Sed residamus, inquit, si placet. Nam Metrodorum non puto ipsum professum, sed, cum appellaretur ab Epicuro, repudiare tantum beneficium noluisse; Nec vero hoc oratione solum, sed multo magis vita et factis et moribus comprobavit. Tertium autem omnibus aut maximis rebus iis, quae secundum naturam sint, fruentem vivere. Consequentia exquirere, quoad sit id, quod volumus, effectum.
Atqui reperies, inquit, in hoc quidem pertinacem; Quamquam in hac divisione rem ipsam prorsus probo, elegantiam desidero. Si mala non sunt, iacet omnis ratio Peripateticorum. At modo dixeras nihil in istis rebus esse, quod interesset. Haec mihi videtur delicatior, ut ita dicam, molliorque ratio, quam virtutis vis gravitasque postulat. Virtutis, magnitudinis animi, patientiae, fortitudinis fomentis dolor mitigari solet. Cupit enim dícere nihil posse ad beatam vitam deesse sapienti. Ergo id est convenienter naturae vivere, a natura discedere. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem.
related episodes
Video
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed quot homines, tot sententiae; Sin aliud quid voles, postea. Illud non continuo, ut aeque incontentae. Ut alios omittam, hunc appello, quem ille unum secutus est. Quae contraria sunt his, malane? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quasi ego id curem, quid ille aiat aut neget. Aut haec tibi, Torquate, sunt vituperanda aut patrocinium voluptatis repudiandum. Verba tu fingas et ea dicas, quae non sentias?
In eo enim positum est id, quod dicimus esse expetendum. Quae cum magnifice primo dici viderentur, considerata minus probabantur. Faceres tu quidem, Torquate, haec omnia; Pauca mutat vel plura sane; Terram, mihi crede, ea lanx et maria deprimet. Id quaeris, inquam, in quo, utrum respondero, verses te huc atque illuc necesse est. Si longus, levis. Qua igitur re ab deo vincitur, si aeternitate non vincitur?
Cum id quoque, ut cupiebat, audivisset, evelli iussit eam, qua erat transfixus, hastam. Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. Nam ista vestra: Si gravis, brevis; Multoque hoc melius nos veriusque quam Stoici. In qua si nihil est praeter rationem, sit in una virtute finis bonorum; Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem;
Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Pauca mutat vel plura sane; ALIO MODO. At quanta conantur! Mundum hunc omnem oppidum esse nostrum! Incendi igitur eos, qui audiunt, vides. Deinde disputat, quod cuiusque generis animantium statui deceat extremum. Non enim quaero quid verum, sed quid cuique dicendum sit. Pisone in eo gymnasio, quod Ptolomaeum vocatur, unaque nobiscum Q. Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas;