Episode 49
The Ethereum Roadmap and Solving the Blockchain Scalability Problem | Vitalik Buterin & Vlad Zamfir
Episode 49
Vitalik Buterin & Vlad Zamfir
The Ethereum Roadmap and Solving the Blockchain Scalability Problem | Vitalik Buterin & Vlad Zamfir
summary
If contracts are the foundation of modern civilization, then our record systems are the infrastructure that keep this foundation from falling apart. These features allow our society to establish and verify identities; give value to goods and services; create and enforce laws; govern interactions between individuals, organizations, and nations — in short, they secure our social, economic, and political policies and allow us to maintain the social order.
But there is a problem with these systems, and they are beginning to buckle and crack.
The information age vastly accelerated the pace of society, allowing individuals to dramatically expand their circles of influence. People can now exchange goods and services (or even enter into contracts) with strangers on the other side of the globe instantaneously. Government agencies and international organizations can maximize processes by storing and retrieving information online. However, these processes are fraught with challenges.
Without the presence of intermediaries, digital transactions have thus far been impossible to verify or enforce. Mediators and middlemen provide accountability on the one hand, in return for higher centralization on the other. This centralization creates opportunities for companies like Facebook and Google to make billions of dollars mining and selling our data. It also presents lucrative opportunities for malicious actors looking to capitalize on our insecure digital infrastructure. The digital records kept by banks and government institutions are frequently the subject of cyber attacks, putting this same data at risk.
As the first decentralized digital currency, bitcoin promised to solve some of these issues; however, bitcoin’s use cases have remained limited to a very narrow set of financial transactions. In response, Vitalik Buterin created Ethereum. In his 2012 white paper, Vitalik outlined an ambitious vision of the future — one that would endeavor to solve the problems associated with our contracts, transactions, and records by creating a new, decentralized layer for data processing and computation on which society could run.
Whereas Bitcoin’s aim was to erect a platform for unmediated digital payments, the goal of Ethereum’s blockchain-based architecture is to entirely dismantle traditional power structures and methods of control. It attempts this by allowing decentralization to saturate all levels of society through the use of an open, distributed ledger that records transactions between parties in a more trusted way way.
In Ethereum blockchain, contracts are embedded within digital code, which are stored in transparent, shared databases. In theory, it makes intermediaries like bankers and lawyers unnecessary and allows individuals to transact freely. Ethereum increase access, transparency, and accountability, without relying on third-parties to secure the ledger.
Ethereum blockchain has opened the door to a new type of economy, yet challenges remain — specifically, challenges to scale.
The most prominent of these scaling challenges has been transaction throughput. Currently, the Ethereum network can process no more than fifteen transactions per second (TPS). This is major barrier to widespread adoption and it has prevented the blockchain from being able to support the type of network traffic that would result from the popular use of any decentralized application (dApp). In response, Vitalik, Vlad, and other key members of the Ethereum have put forward a roadmap for scaling the Ethereum network.
From sharding to Plasma to Casper, in this week’s episode, host Demetri Kofinas is joined by Vlad Zamfir, one of is the world’s leading Ethereum researchers, and Vitalik Buterin to discuss the future of Ethereum, the problems it faces on the path to widespread adoption, and the solutions that promise to carry us into a decentralized digital age.
Producer & Host: Demetri Kofinas
Editor & Engineer: Stylianos Nicolaou
Join the conversation on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @hiddenforcespod
bio
Vitalik Buterin is the creator of Ethereum. He first discovered blockchain and cryptocurrency technologies through Bitcoin in 2011, and was immediately excited by the technology and its potential. He cofounded Bitcoin Magazine in September 2011, and after two and a half years looking at what the existing blockchain technology and applications had to offer, wrote the Ethereum white paper in November 2013. He now leads Ethereum’s research team, working on future versions of the Ethereum protocol.
Vlad Zamfir is a researcher known in the Ethereum blockchain community for his work on blockchain-based consensus protocols, especially on proof-of-stake (Casper), and sharding. He also does research and education in other related areas, such as cryptoeconomics and blockchain governance.
transcript
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quodcumque in mentem incideret, et quodcumque tamquam occurreret. Quid iudicant sensus? At iam decimum annum in spelunca iacet. Quid est enim aliud esse versutum? Quare, quoniam de primis naturae commodis satis dietum est nunc de maioribus consequentibusque videamus. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Videmusne ut pueri ne verberibus quidem a contemplandis rebus perquirendisque deterreantur? Si mala non sunt, iacet omnis ratio Peripateticorum.
Hoc etsi multimodis reprehendi potest, tamen accipio, quod dant. Apparet statim, quae sint officia, quae actiones. Frater et T. Experiamur igitur, inquit, etsi habet haec Stoicorum ratio difficilius quiddam et obscurius. Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus. Naturales divitias dixit parabiles esse, quod parvo esset natura contenta. Immo alio genere; Nam de summo mox, ut dixi, videbimus et ad id explicandum disputationem omnem conferemus. Certe, nisi voluptatem tanti aestimaretis. Nec vero sum nescius esse utilitatem in historia, non modo voluptatem. Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Unum est sine dolore esse, alterum cum voluptate. Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant.
At iam decimum annum in spelunca iacet. Deinde prima illa, quae in congressu solemus: Quid tu, inquit, huc? Aliis esse maiora, illud dubium, ad id, quod summum bonum dicitis, ecquaenam possit fieri accessio. Si verbum sequimur, primum longius verbum praepositum quam bonum.
Atque his de rebus et splendida est eorum et illustris oratio. Nam si beatus umquam fuisset, beatam vitam usque ad illum a Cyro extructum rogum pertulisset. Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. Expectoque quid ad id, quod quaerebam, respondeas. At cum de plurimis eadem dicit, tum certe de maximis. Ita relinquet duas, de quibus etiam atque etiam consideret. Quae quo sunt excelsiores, eo dant clariora indicia naturae. Itaque contra est, ac dicitis;
Full Episode
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Ratio enim nostra consentit, pugnat oratio. Paulum, cum regem Persem captum adduceret, eodem flumine invectio? Quis animo aequo videt eum, quem inpure ac flagitiose putet vivere? Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Si enim ita est, vide ne facinus facias, cum mori suadeas.
Istic sum, inquit. Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. In qua quid est boni praeter summam voluptatem, et eam sempiternam? Quae est igitur causa istarum angustiarum? Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus. Vos autem cum perspicuis dubia debeatis illustrare, dubiis perspicua conamini tollere. Sic enim maiores nostri labores non fugiendos tristissimo tamen verbo aerumnas etiam in deo nominaverunt.
Hoc est non modo cor non habere, sed ne palatum quidem. Nam, ut sint illa vendibiliora, haec uberiora certe sunt. Itaque his sapiens semper vacabit. Amicitiae vero locus ubi esse potest aut quis amicus esse cuiquam, quem non ipsum amet propter ipsum? Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Quis animo aequo videt eum, quem inpure ac flagitiose putet vivere?
Quid, quod homines infima fortuna, nulla spe rerum gerendarum, opifices denique delectantur historia? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio. Ego quoque, inquit, didicerim libentius si quid attuleris, quam te reprehenderim. Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego.
intelligence report
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Tum Quintus: Est plane, Piso, ut dicis, inquit. Homines optimi non intellegunt totam rationem everti, si ita res se habeat. Quare obscurentur etiam haec, quae secundum naturam esse dicimus, in vita beata; De vacuitate doloris eadem sententia erit. Quae est igitur causa istarum angustiarum? Ut optime, secundum naturam affectum esse possit. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Primum quid tu dicis breve? Est igitur officium eius generis, quod nec in bonis ponatur nec in contrariis. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. Propter nos enim illam, non propter eam nosmet ipsos diligimus. Explanetur igitur.
Non est igitur summum malum dolor. Hoc ne statuam quidem dicturam pater aiebat, si loqui posset. Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Tertium autem omnibus aut maximis rebus iis, quae secundum naturam sint, fruentem vivere. Quos quidem tibi studiose et diligenter tractandos magnopere censeo. Tum ille: Ain tandem?
Est enim effectrix multarum et magnarum voluptatum. Haec dicuntur fortasse ieiunius; Huius ego nunc auctoritatem sequens idem faciam. Qui ita affectus, beatum esse numquam probabis; Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Quid est enim aliud esse versutum? Ergo in utroque exercebantur, eaque disciplina effecit tantam illorum utroque in genere dicendi copiam. Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. Cur igitur, cum de re conveniat, non malumus usitate loqui? Tum ille: Tu autem cum ipse tantum librorum habeas, quos hic tandem requiris?
related episodes
Video
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quod idem cum vestri faciant, non satis magnam tribuunt inventoribus gratiam. Quid ergo hoc loco intellegit honestum? Tum Quintus: Est plane, Piso, ut dicis, inquit. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Et nemo nimium beatus est; Etsi ea quidem, quae adhuc dixisti, quamvis ad aetatem recte isto modo dicerentur. Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. Unum est sine dolore esse, alterum cum voluptate. Non est igitur voluptas bonum. Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Quod iam a me expectare noli. Quos quidem tibi studiose et diligenter tractandos magnopere censeo. Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit.
Dicet pro me ipsa virtus nec dubitabit isti vestro beato M. Ut pulsi recurrant? Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Si enim ad populum me vocas, eum. Terram, mihi crede, ea lanx et maria deprimet. Hanc quoque iucunditatem, si vis, transfer in animum; Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt. Praeterea et appetendi et refugiendi et omnino rerum gerendarum initia proficiscuntur aut a voluptate aut a dolore.
Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur. Modo etiam paulum ad dexteram de via declinavi, ut ad Pericli sepulcrum accederem. An, partus ancillae sitne in fructu habendus, disseretur inter principes civitatis, P. Res enim se praeclare habebat, et quidem in utraque parte. Quos nisi redarguimus, omnis virtus, omne decus, omnis vera laus deserenda est. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Istic sum, inquit.