Episode 117
David Epstein | Range: Why Generalists Triumph in Today’s Specialized World
Episode 117
David Epstein
David Epstein | Range: Why Generalists Triumph in Today’s Specialized World
summary
In this week’s episode of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with author David Epstein about what the world’s most successful people have in common. He discovers that in most fields—especially those that are complex and unpredictable—generalists, not specialists, are the ones primed for success. “As computers master more of the skills once reserved for highly focused humans,” says David, “people who think broadly and embrace diverse experiences and perspectives will increasingly thrive.”
David’s conclusions run counter to the prevailing view among “experts” who argue that anyone who wants to develop a skill, play an instrument, or lead their field should start early, focus intensely, and rack up as many hours of deliberate practice as possible. “If you dabble or delay,” they say “you’ll never catch up to the people who got a head start.” But a closer look at research on the world’s top performers, from professional athletes to Nobel laureates, paints a very different picture. In fact, it shows that early specialization is actually the exception, not the rule.
In his research, David Epstein discovers that while generalists often do find their path late—juggling many interests rather than focusing on one—they arrive at their destination with a higher degree of “fit” after undergoing a prolonged sampling period. They’re also more creative, more agile, and able to make connections their more specialized peers can’t see.
In their conversation, David Epstein makes a compelling case for actively cultivating inefficiency. He explains why failing a test is the best way to learn and that frequent quitters end up with the most fulfilling careers. He gives example after example of how some of the most impactful inventors cross domains rather than deepening their knowledge in a single area. In a 21st century increasingly dominated by automation and the specter of artificial intelligence, David believes that people who think broadly and embrace diverse experiences and perspectives will increasingly thrive.
You can access the rundown to this week’s episode, along with a transcript to Demetri’s conversation with David through the Hidden Forces Supercast Page. All subscribers also gain access to our overtime feed, which can be easily be added to your favorite podcast application, allowing you to listen in on the rest of Demetri and David’s conversation.
Producer & Host: Demetri Kofinas
Editor & Engineer: Stylianos Nicolaou
Subscribe & Support the Podcast at http://patreon.com/hiddenforces
Join the conversation on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @hiddenforcespod
bio
David Epstein is the author of Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World, and The Sports Gene, which has been translated in 18 languages. He was previously a science and investigative reporter at ProPublica, and prior to that a senior writer at Sports Illustrated, where he co-authored the story that revealed Yankees third baseman Alex Rodriguez had used steroids. His writing has been honored by an array of organizations, from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, to the Society of Professional Journalists and the National Center on Disability and Journalism, and has been included in the Best American Science and Nature Writing anthology. His story “Following the Trail of Broken Hearts,” on sudden cardiac death in athletes, was chosen as one of the top 100 stories of the last 100 years by Columbia Journalism alumni. David has master’s degrees in environmental science and journalism and is reasonably sure he’s the only person to have co-authored a paper in the journal of Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research while a writer at Sports Illustrated. He has worked as an ecology researcher in the Arctic, studied geology and astronomy while residing in the Sonoran Desert, and blithely signed up to work on the D-deck of a seismic research vessel shortly after it had been attacked by pirates. An avid runner, he was a Columbia University record holder and twice NCAA All-East as an 800-meter runner.
transcript
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid enim de amicitia statueris utilitatis causa expetenda vides. Ergo ita: non posse honeste vivi, nisi honeste vivatur? Iis igitur est difficilius satis facere, qui se Latina scripta dicunt contemnere. Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. At quicum ioca seria, ut dicitur, quicum arcana, quicum occulta omnia? Vitiosum est enim in dividendo partem in genere numerare. Illi enim inter se dissentiunt.
Ita fit cum gravior, tum etiam splendidior oratio. Deinde qui fit, ut ego nesciam, sciant omnes, quicumque Epicurei esse voluerunt? Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem; Iam id ipsum absurdum, maximum malum neglegi.
Animum autem reliquis rebus ita perfecit, ut corpus; Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Sed ad bona praeterita redeamus. Cum ageremus, inquit, vitae beatum et eundem supremum diem, scribebamus haec. Frater et T.
Praeclare enim Plato: Beatum, cui etiam in senectute contigerit, ut sapientiam verasque opiniones assequi possit. Quae similitudo in genere etiam humano apparet. Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Sed vobis voluptatum perceptarum recordatio vitam beatam facit, et quidem corpore perceptarum. Et ego: Piso, inquam, si est quisquam, qui acute in causis videre soleat quae res agatur. Tu quidem reddes; Satis est tibi in te, satis in legibus, satis in mediocribus amicitiis praesidii. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Satis est ad hoc responsum.
Full Episode
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Te ipsum, dignissimum maioribus tuis, voluptasne induxit, ut adolescentulus eriperes P. Theophrastus mediocriterne delectat, cum tractat locos ab Aristotele ante tractatos? Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Nonne videmus quanta perturbatio rerum omnium consequatur, quanta confusio? Sed in rebus apertissimis nimium longi sumus. Immo alio genere; Diodorus, eius auditor, adiungit ad honestatem vacuitatem doloris. Nec mihi illud dixeris: Haec enim ipsa mihi sunt voluptati, et erant illa Torquatis. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc dixerit potius Ennius: Nimium boni est, cui nihil est mali.
Si verbum sequimur, primum longius verbum praepositum quam bonum. Cuius quidem, quoniam Stoicus fuit, sententia condemnata mihi videtur esse inanitas ista verborum. Mihi enim satis est, ipsis non satis. Partim cursu et peragratione laetantur, congregatione aliae coetum quodam modo civitatis imitantur; Tum Quintus: Est plane, Piso, ut dicis, inquit. Sed hoc sane concedamus.
Ita finis bonorum existit secundum naturam vivere sic affectum, ut optime is affici possit ad naturamque accommodatissime. Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Non pugnem cum homine, cur tantum habeat in natura boni; Cenasti in vita numquam bene, cum omnia in ista Consumis squilla atque acupensere cum decimano. Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt. Itaque hic ipse iam pridem est reiectus;
Quae duo sunt, unum facit. Diodorus, eius auditor, adiungit ad honestatem vacuitatem doloris. His enim rebus detractis negat se reperire in asotorum vita quod reprehendat. Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Cum autem negant ea quicquam ad beatam vitam pertinere, rursus naturam relinquunt. Vide, ne etiam menses! nisi forte eum dicis, qui, simul atque arripuit, interficit.
intelligence report
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas; Hoc dictum in una re latissime patet, ut in omnibus factis re, non teste moveamur. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem.
Ut nemo dubitet, eorum omnia officia quo spectare, quid sequi, quid fugere debeant? At enim hic etiam dolore. Potius inflammat, ut coercendi magis quam dedocendi esse videantur. Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Vadem te ad mortem tyranno dabis pro amico, ut Pythagoreus ille Siculo fecit tyranno? Odium autem et invidiam facile vitabis. Quamquam id quidem licebit iis existimare, qui legerint. Atqui iste locus est, Piso, tibi etiam atque etiam confirmandus, inquam; Quamquam ab iis philosophiam et omnes ingenuas disciplinas habemus; Quis tibi ergo istud dabit praeter Pyrrhonem, Aristonem eorumve similes, quos tu non probas?
Incommoda autem et commoda-ita enim estmata et dustmata appello-communia esse voluerunt, paria noluerunt. Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Si mala non sunt, iacet omnis ratio Peripateticorum. Atque ab his initiis profecti omnium virtutum et originem et progressionem persecuti sunt. Vulgo enim dicitur: Iucundi acti labores, nec male Euripidesconcludam, si potero, Latine; Sic enim maiores nostri labores non fugiendos tristissimo tamen verbo aerumnas etiam in deo nominaverunt.
related episodes
Video
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aperiendum est igitur, quid sit voluptas; Quare, quoniam de primis naturae commodis satis dietum est nunc de maioribus consequentibusque videamus. Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas? Virtutibus igitur rectissime mihi videris et ad consuetudinem nostrae orationis vitia posuisse contraria. Quamquam in hac divisione rem ipsam prorsus probo, elegantiam desidero. Summus dolor plures dies manere non potest?
Haeret in salebra. Quae fere omnia appellantur uno ingenii nomine, easque virtutes qui habent, ingeniosi vocantur. Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Apud imperitos tum illa dicta sunt, aliquid etiam coronae datum; Sed tamen omne, quod de re bona dilucide dicitur, mihi praeclare dici videtur.
Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Et homini, qui ceteris animantibus plurimum praestat, praecipue a natura nihil datum esse dicemus? Illud mihi a te nimium festinanter dictum videtur, sapientis omnis esse semper beatos; Et ais, si una littera commota sit, fore tota ut labet disciplina. Eam stabilem appellas. Nulla erit controversia.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nam, ut sint illa vendibiliora, haec uberiora certe sunt. Gerendus est mos, modo recte sentiat. Quid enim necesse est, tamquam meretricem in matronarum coetum, sic voluptatem in virtutum concilium adducere? In primo enim ortu inest teneritas ac mollitia quaedam, ut nec res videre optimas nec agere possint. Istam voluptatem perpetuam quis potest praestare sapienti? Nam Metrodorum non puto ipsum professum, sed, cum appellaretur ab Epicuro, repudiare tantum beneficium noluisse; Non enim quaero quid verum, sed quid cuique dicendum sit. Rationis enim perfectio est virtus; Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae?