Market Forces
A Crash Course for Uber. Dispatches from a Transportation Industry Analyst | Hubert Horan
Market Forces
Hubert Horan
A Crash Course for Uber. Dispatches from a Transportation Industry Analyst | Hubert Horan
summary
Demetri Kofinas speaks with transportation industry veteran and analyst, Hubert Horan about the ridesharing company Uber, which may not have the ability to survive more than 2 years without raising additional capital or selling part or all of its remaining assets. As Demetri Kofinas has said in a prior discussion with Evan Lorenz of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, “This could be the biggest financial blow-up in the history of private placements.”
With roughly $7 billion of cash on hand, along with an untapped $2.3 billion credit facility, Uber may not have the financing available to survive more than 2 years without raising additional capital or selling part or all of its remaining assets. As Demetri Kofinas has said in a prior discussion with Evan Lorenz of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, “This could be the biggest financial blow-up in the history of private placements.”
Producer & Host: Demetri Kofinas
Editor & Engineer: Stylianos Nicolaou
Join the conversation at @hiddenforcespod
bio
Hubert Horan began his aviation career in the early 1980s as a consultant with the firms of Cresap, McCormick and Paget and Mercer Management Consulting (formerly Strategic Planning Associates/Temple Barker & Sloane). Clients included Qantas, Air New Zealand, Phillipine Airlines, Lufthansa, Alitalia, Air Canada, Canadian Airlines, TWA, United, USAirways, Pan American, People Express, Frontier, PSA, AirCal, and Amadeus.
Between 1991 and 2002 he held Network and Strategic Management positions with Northwest, America West, Swissair and Sabena. Since 2002 he has been an independent consultant based in Phoenix, Arizona. Clients in recent years have included ATA, Hawaiian Airlines, United, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, SN Brussels Airlines, Virgin Express, and Air Macau. He has also worked with investor groups to develop business plans for both Low Cost Airlines and airport privatization projects.
In the 1980s he developed the original plan for the TWA-Ozark merger and participated in the USAir–Piedmont and Continental-People Express mergers. He worked on a series of projects with Lufthansa and Alitalia to help them prepare for liberalization within Europe, and prepared the original plan for a Qantas-Australian-Air New Zealand merger. He has also led major cost-reduction projects across the entire range of airline marketing and operations functions, including Maintenance, Flight Operations, In-Flight Service, Sales and Distribution, Station Operations, Charter Operations and Revenue Management.
He had a front row seat for the 1990s industry downturn, leading the massive restructuring of Northwest’s international route network that was the key to Northwest’s financial turnaround. In a one year period, Mr. Horan cancelled over 80,000 miles of unprofitable routes, including uncompetitive hubs in Seoul, Boston and Guam, and reallocated flying to powerful hubs in Detroit, Minneapolis and Tokyo, and helped Northwest achieve industry leading profit margins only three years after a near-collapse into bankruptcy.
Mr. Horan developed and implemented the business and fleet plan America West used to successfully emerge from bankruptcy in the mid 90s. That plan significantly repositioned America West in the marketplace, established their current coast-to-coast network, dramatically reduced its direct competitive exposure to Southwest Airlines, and profitably increased their fleet and operations by 25%.
He is one of the world’s leading experts on the international airline alliances, having been responsible for the original development of the KLM-Northwest alliance network. Within 18 months Mr. Horan increased flying between Amsterdam and NWA’s hubs from 2 to 9 daily flights, which turned Northwest into the most profitable US airline on the North Atlantic. The intense hub-to-hub links that Mr. Horan helped pioneer continue to drive the success of all of the North Atlantic alliance networks. He spent four years in Zurich grappling with Swissair-Sabena, Europe’s first cross-border merger, and managing North Atlantic alliances from the European perspective, including the transition of Swissair’s alliance from Delta to American.
While his alliance innovations on the North Atlantic were highly profitable, he also moved aggressively to kill alliances that did not create any competitive or financial value. His work led to eventual termination of the America West-Continental alliance, and he also helped halt development of the Qualiflyer alliance between Swissair, Sabena, Austrian, TAP, Turkish, and a number of other European carriers.
As Swissair/Sabena management knew that the SAir Group’s conglomerate strategy was doomed to fail, Mr. Horan led an internal effort to develop restructuring plans for both carriers. His plan to reorganize Swissair around its historical brand and longhaul product strengths was rejected in favor of a plan to create a totally new brand under the management of its regional subsidiary, a plan that cost Swiss taxpayers US$4 billion and nearly led to the total liquidation of the airline. His even more extreme proposal for restructuring Sabena into a carrier strictly focused on local traffic led to the successful creation of SN Brussels Airlines which became profitable only three years after the demise of Sabena. More recently Mr. Horan helped developed the plan for merging SN Brussels and Virgin Express.
He has been actively involved in the evolution of Chinese airline competition, developing a detailed financial restructuring plan for Air Macau, and designing network plans for three startup carriers, and network plans for Shanghai Pudong operations under a proposed China Eastern-Shanghai Airlines merger. He has worked extensively on fleet planning projects, including a recent major fleet upgrade at Air Pacific.
Recently, he has been active as an opponent of radical airline industry consolidation, and other efforts to undermine the benefits of liberal, market-based competition. Given his personal involvement with the original, successful North Atlantic alliances, and his experience with airline network competition and merger activity on four continents, he has provided expert analysis on several antitrust immunity cases, testified before Congress on both the Delta-Northwest and United-Continental mergers, and published a detailed article on the competitive impacts of recent antitrust immunity cases in the Transportation Law Journal.
He has been heavily involved with recent airline bankruptcy reorganizations. In addition to internal work at Northwest, America West and Sabena, he developed the restructuring plan for Hawaiian Airlines’ bankruptcy emergence, which included the original plan for the development of Hawaiian’s Asian opertaions. He also worked for creditor groups on the United and USAirways bankruptcies, helped develop the Southwest-ATA codesharing alliance that provided the basis for ATA’s restructuring. and worked on the American Airlines reorganization, including the original plan to merge American and USAirways.
Mr. Horan graduated from Wesleyan University in 1976 with B.A., and Honors in Economics. In 1980 he graduated from Yale University’s graduate School of Management with an MPPM (MBA) degree.
transcript
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Torquatus, is qui consul cum Cn. Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. Quid, quod res alia tota est? Compensabatur, inquit, cum summis doloribus laetitia. Bonum liberi: misera orbitas. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sed quanta sit alias, nunc tantum possitne esse tanta. Quis Aristidem non mortuum diligit?
Id enim volumus, id contendimus, ut officii fructus sit ipsum officium. Hoc non est positum in nostra actione. Atque ab his initiis profecti omnium virtutum et originem et progressionem persecuti sunt. Quod cum accidisset ut alter alterum necopinato videremus, surrexit statim. Cur id non ita fit? Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Propter nos enim illam, non propter eam nosmet ipsos diligimus. Quid turpius quam sapientis vitam ex insipientium sermone pendere? Sed emolumenta communia esse dicuntur, recte autem facta et peccata non habentur communia. Quod autem principium officii quaerunt, melius quam Pyrrho;
Quos nisi redarguimus, omnis virtus, omne decus, omnis vera laus deserenda est. Omnis enim est natura diligens sui. Sed fortuna fortis; Vitae autem degendae ratio maxime quidem illis placuit quieta. Primum cur ista res digna odio est, nisi quod est turpis? Re mihi non aeque satisfacit, et quidem locis pluribus. Quid in isto egregio tuo officio et tanta fide-sic enim existimo-ad corpus refers? Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Quodcumque in mentem incideret, et quodcumque tamquam occurreret.
Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit. Hoc ne statuam quidem dicturam pater aiebat, si loqui posset. Inde sermone vario sex illa a Dipylo stadia confecimus. Quod autem principium officii quaerunt, melius quam Pyrrho; Vulgo enim dicitur: Iucundi acti labores, nec male Euripidesconcludam, si potero, Latine; Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere. Sextilio Rufo, cum is rem ad amicos ita deferret, se esse heredem Q.
Full Episode
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In quo etsi est magnus, tamen nova pleraque et perpauca de moribus. Ita multo sanguine profuso in laetitia et in victoria est mortuus. Quae cum dixisset, finem ille. Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum.
Quod cum accidisset ut alter alterum necopinato videremus, surrexit statim. Quo igitur, inquit, modo? Ut optime, secundum naturam affectum esse possit. Quae similitudo in genere etiam humano apparet. Sed residamus, inquit, si placet. Vos autem cum perspicuis dubia debeatis illustrare, dubiis perspicua conamini tollere. Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Immo videri fortasse. Inde igitur, inquit, ordiendum est. Nam memini etiam quae nolo, oblivisci non possum quae volo.
Et quidem, inquit, vehementer errat; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Minime vero istorum quidem, inquit. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba. Qui autem de summo bono dissentit de tota philosophiae ratione dissentit.
Restatis igitur vos; Quid est igitur, inquit, quod requiras? Hoc sic expositum dissimile est superiori. Sed tu istuc dixti bene Latine, parum plane. Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles? Dat enim intervalla et relaxat.
intelligence report
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Et quidem, inquit, vehementer errat; Quae cum magnifice primo dici viderentur, considerata minus probabantur. Portenta haec esse dicit, neque ea ratione ullo modo posse vivi; Nec vero alia sunt quaerenda contra Carneadeam illam sententiam. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Cur igitur easdem res, inquam, Peripateticis dicentibus verbum nullum est, quod non intellegatur? Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Hanc quoque iucunditatem, si vis, transfer in animum; Quid enim me prohiberet Epicureum esse, si probarem, quae ille diceret?
Huic mori optimum esse propter desperationem sapientiae, illi propter spem vivere. At iam decimum annum in spelunca iacet. Nec lapathi suavitatem acupenseri Galloni Laelius anteponebat, sed suavitatem ipsam neglegebat; Tantum dico, magis fuisse vestrum agere Epicuri diem natalem, quam illius testamento cavere ut ageretur. Respondeat totidem verbis. Quid ad utilitatem tantae pecuniae? Respondeat totidem verbis.
Nam Pyrrho, Aristo, Erillus iam diu abiecti. Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re; Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus?
extra material
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Illud urgueam, non intellegere eum quid sibi dicendum sit, cum dolorem summum malum esse dixerit. Quodsi ipsam honestatem undique pertectam atque absolutam. Quae tamen a te agetur non melior, quam illae sunt, quas interdum optines. Et nemo nimium beatus est; Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Octavio fuit, cum illam severitatem in eo filio adhibuit, quem in adoptionem D. Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina. Qua ex cognitione facilior facta est investigatio rerum occultissimarum. Atque ego: Scis me, inquam, istud idem sentire, Piso, sed a te opportune facta mentio est. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; An eum discere ea mavis, quae cum plane perdidiceriti nihil sciat? De ingenio eius in his disputationibus, non de moribus quaeritur. Quare si potest esse beatus is, qui est in asperis reiciendisque rebus, potest is quoque esse. Aliud igitur esse censet gaudere, aliud non dolere. Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere.
Quantum Aristoxeni ingenium consumptum videmus in musicis? Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Bonum incolumis acies: misera caecitas. Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem;
Sed ille, ut dixi, vitiose. Quid ergo attinet dicere: Nihil haberem, quod reprehenderem, si finitas cupiditates haberent? Inde sermone vario sex illa a Dipylo stadia confecimus. Qui autem de summo bono dissentit de tota philosophiae ratione dissentit. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Potius ergo illa dicantur: turpe esse, viri non esse debilitari dolore, frangi, succumbere. Quid est enim aliud esse versutum? Quis est tam dissimile homini. Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit;
related episodes
Video
content locked
or Subscribe to Access Premium Content
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Philosophi autem in suis lectulis plerumque moriuntur. Scaevola tribunus plebis ferret ad plebem vellentne de ea re quaeri. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Scio enim esse quosdam, qui quavis lingua philosophari possint; Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego. Itaque his sapiens semper vacabit.
Ut aliquid scire se gaudeant? Quid dubitas igitur mutare principia naturae? Hunc vos beatum; Ergo illi intellegunt quid Epicurus dicat, ego non intellego? Quonam, inquit, modo?
Nam si amitti vita beata potest, beata esse non potest. Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius. Nos autem non solum beatae vitae istam esse oblectationem videmus, sed etiam levamentum miseriarum. Quem Tiberina descensio festo illo die tanto gaudio affecit, quanto L. Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem. Sin aliud quid voles, postea. Quibus ego vehementer assentior.
Bonum integritas corporis: misera debilitas. Eaedem res maneant alio modo. Videamus igitur sententias eorum, tum ad verba redeamus. Sed eum qui audiebant, quoad poterant, defendebant sententiam suam. Quodsi vultum tibi, si incessum fingeres, quo gravior viderere, non esses tui similis; Vitae autem degendae ratio maxime quidem illis placuit quieta. Item de contrariis, a quibus ad genera formasque generum venerunt. Bestiarum vero nullum iudicium puto. Inquit, an parum disserui non verbis Stoicos a Peripateticis, sed universa re et tota sententia dissidere? Ita relinquet duas, de quibus etiam atque etiam consideret. Occultum facinus esse potuerit, gaudebit; Idemque diviserunt naturam hominis in animum et corpus.
